<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Absorption Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manausa.com/understanding-absorption-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manausa.com/understanding-absorption-rates/</link>
	<description>All About Tallahassee Housing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:13:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Manausa</title>
		<link>http://www.manausa.com/understanding-absorption-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Manausa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manausa.com/blog/?p=123#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Great question Steven. Short answer is the statistics would look worse. I suspect even without seasonality they would look worse.

Unfortunately, you have to use the entire year. More sales occur from March through August than occur from September through February each year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Steven. Short answer is the statistics would look worse. I suspect even without seasonality they would look worse.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, you have to use the entire year. More sales occur from March through August than occur from September through February each year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.manausa.com/understanding-absorption-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manausa.com/blog/?p=123#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the chart.  It&#039;s very informative.

How different is that chart if you change the parameter to let&#039;s say the last six months rather than the last year?

I ask because, as I understand it, the market really went South after August 2007, when the availability of easy mortgages started to dry up.

If you used statistics from the past six month, which only includes the current tough credit market, do the statistics look much worse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the chart.  It&#8217;s very informative.</p>
<p>How different is that chart if you change the parameter to let&#8217;s say the last six months rather than the last year?</p>
<p>I ask because, as I understand it, the market really went South after August 2007, when the availability of easy mortgages started to dry up.</p>
<p>If you used statistics from the past six month, which only includes the current tough credit market, do the statistics look much worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
